Raising
student achievement: My teacher inquiry-What now?
Your
action plan will be a dynamic document and you will be expected to share your
progress with you colleagues during PLD sessions. Keep in mind the school PLD 2017 goals.
Name: Richard Tuhaka School:
Tolaga Bay Area School
Date: 2017
SMART goal? How
to implement technology successfully into my Sustainability Classes?
Recording,
processing and displaying data, dialogue and visual aides through technology
namely the internet and blogging.
Are the
students learning and understanding what is being taught? Can they respond or
relay back their understandings through the introduction of devices and more
intensive in the field learning?
S
specific
|
M
measurable
|
A
achievable
|
R
realistic
|
T
time bound
|
My PLD goals: What will be my focus this year?
|
|
Students use
devices all the time and are comfortable with most technology especially
apps. Can they use this successfully in classroom practice? An initial
feeling is 50-50. Confidence on phones does not transfer into confidence on
computers. Confidence in applications is not confidence in understanding
concepts and ideas around sustainability. Confidence on devices does not
transfer into confidence in speaking.
|
Noticing
What is
happening here?
Is this what we
expected?
Should we be
concerned?
Do we need to
take a closer look?
|
Practice makes
perfect. Initial attempts are varied. A few are confident and showing clear
understanding of concepts to be presented. A few are not. Lack
self-motivation to be accurate. More work can improve this. Keep going.
|
Investigating
What do we
already know about this?
What do we need
to find out?
How might we do
this?
|
The students
concerned have a range of abilities and vary in literacy and numeracy skill
levels. Testing and assessment shows this already. Their actions reinforce it
to another degree. This means they have, possibly, low self-esteem or
confidence when understanding and explaining what is taught or learnt and
then what needs to be done next. Risk taking needs to be explored more.
Discussion during tasks need to be more. Reinforcement of concepts and ideas
as we work.
|
Collaborative Sense Making
What is our
data telling us?
What insights
does it provide?
Is this good
enough?
What might we
need to explore further?
|
We need to make
mistakes and learn that mistakes are a part of the learning process. Its ok
to admit mistakes and identify them and use them to ensure we correct them or
make improvements to our learning. The change is minor to major. Depending on
individual students feelings and willingness to take risks and make mistakes.
The strengths are that we are already doing and participating in the concepts
of sustainability. Our hands on activities all relate directly to concepts
and ideas. Support needs to be around verbalizing what has taken place. The
steps along the way and linking what we do to each concept.
|
Prioritising to take action
What do we need
to do and why?
How big is the
change we are planning?
What strengths
do we have to draw on?
What support
might we need?
|
Monitoring and Evaluating Impact
What is
happening as a result of our improvement actions?
What evidence
do we have of progress?
Is this good
enough?
Do we need to
adjust what we are doing?
What are we
learning here?
|
Learning
Mentor 2016
My teacher
inquiry mentor for 2016 is:
We have agreed to
have progress meetings:
(weekly,
fortnightly, monthly)
Date
of meeting
|
Notes of discussion
|
Target
ARONA Students 2016
Target students- select
a group (5 or 6) of ARONA students in one class who you would identify as a
priority- they are at risk of under achieving this year.
Who are they and
what evidence have you used to identify these students who are at risk of
underachieving?
Student name (class, ethnicity,
gender)
|
Evidence
|
Janelle
|
Assessment
data around literacy and numeracy
Behaviour
while not disruptive or concerning can be withdrawn and lack motivation.
|
Liam
|
One on one
sessions have shown lower than expected literacy skills. Also a reluctance to
use technology especially new technology.
|
Brannagan
|
Behaviour
while not disruptive or concerning can be withdrawn and lack motivation.
Can become
disengaged and may have chosen this course as the lesser of three evils.
|
Caitlin
|
Assessment
data around literacy and numeracy
|
Jasmine
|
Behaviour
while not disruptive or concerning can be withdrawn and lack motivation
especially in terms of writing on computers so far.
|
Tolaga
Bay Area School Backward Mapping the Evidence
Collecting and
having a conversation about evidence about your extraordinary, everyday
practice, connecting your practice to the PTC and how your practice and the PTC
relate to Tataiako.
Tataiako Cultural Competency
|
Whanaungatanga
|
Manaakitanga
|
Tangata whenuatanga
|
Ako
|
Wananga
|
Ako
|
Manaakitanga
|
Ako
|
Tangata whenuatanga
|
Tangata whenuatanga
|
Wananga
|
Wananga Ako
|
Evidence
Sources
|
PTC
|
|||||||||||
1
Relation-ships
|
2
Well
being
|
3
Treaty
|
4
Ongoing
PD
|
5
Leadership
|
6
Learning
plans
|
7
Engagement
|
8
Learning
|
9
Diversity
|
10
Bicultural
|
11
Assessment
|
12
Inquiry
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment